Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Greg's avatar

Wishful fictional thinking does make reality happen. The rounds of rebirth become happier when we practice Dhamma, but it won't fix the world. Especially not the world of politics and humans. It could but it won't. Even the Buddha did not say he could fix the world, he did however teach us how to escape from the rounds of rebirth. So creating a fictional narrative and putting your words into the mouths of others as if they agreed with you is quite offensive to those individuals legacy. It is better to let them speak for themselves. Unfortunately there are always people going from light to light, light to dark, dark to light and dark to dark. That is nature. The darker a mind the harder it is to see light. Min Aung Hlaing does not have the wisdom to escape from his darkness. He is no Ashoka who didn't take long to realise his mistake. Ashoka was not killing his own people. He was much smarter than that.

Neural Foundry's avatar

Profoundly moving portrayal of moral leadership under duress. The Asokan transformation you frame here—from conquerer to conscience—cuts to the heart of what revolutionary change actually requires beyond structural shifts. When Daw Suu distinguishes between inverting tyranny versus transcending its logic, that captures somethng I've rarely seen articulated so cleanly in political discourse. The satipaṭṭhāna as insurgent praxis idea is particuarly sharp.

No posts

Ready for more?